Democrat Mary Peltola, the former representative challenging Senator Dan Sullivan (R – Alaska), recently took a trip to several Western Alaska villages. She posted videos from each stop.
In a video she posted from Tooksok Bay, Peltola referenced serious conversations she had with elders. She said, “The number one thing is stopping factory trawling, getting abundance back in our oceans and rivers.”
Beautiful day in Toksook Bay! pic.twitter.com/51YQ86VOft
— Mary Peltola (@MaryPeltola) April 2, 2026
But days later, Peltola met with Coastal Village Region Fund (CVRF) – one of six Community Development Quota (CDQ) groups in Western Alaska. CVRF is the only CDQ group that operates their own factory trawlers. The other CDQ groups have heavily invested in the federal groundfish fisheries, but don’t operates factory trawlers. All the CDQs except CVRF lease out their quotas.

CDQ groups provide tens of millions of dollars per year to Western Alaska communities. The CDQ program began in 1992 as part of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act.
According to the North Pacific Fishery Management Council website, the purpose of the CDQ program is to:
- (i) to provide eligible western Alaska villages with the opportunity to participate and invest in fisheries in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area;
- (ii) to support economic development in western Alaska;
- (iii) to alleviate poverty and provide economic and social benefits for residents of western Alaska; and
- (iv) to achieve sustainable and diversified local economies in western Alaska.
The interesting thing is that Tooksok Bay, the village where Peltola said the number one thing is to stop factory trawling, has heavily benefitted from the CDG program.
CVRF, not wanting to waste a good PR opportunity, recently made a Facebook post saying that Tooksok Bay has received $9.6 million from the CDQ program in the last seven years.
CVRF’s post about Peltola was later posted in the unhinged Facebook group “STOP Alaskan Trawler Bycatch,” run by David Bayes. The comments section is filled with gems like, “Hard to be pro-CDQ and anti-trawl at the same time…..” and “She’ll probably get a lifetime supply of Pollock.”

The anti-trawler rhetoric, started by Peltola in 2022 with her “Fish, family, and freedom” slogan, has spilled over into the open governor’s race. Several gubernational candidates have adopted the populist anti-trawler position, encouraged by Bayes and his ilk. But so far, none have been willing to debate anyone from the trawl industry.




Didn’t you know PELTOLA and fellow democrats can actually have their cake and eat it too due to the DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO rule they follow without fail? She forgot to do it AFTER she got ELECTED not before since “all bets and promises are off once elected”
It is a smart thing to sit and talk with “adversaries” to improve understandings. Similar to “reaching across the aisle” instead of promoting the divisiveness that is plaguing our country. For you to imply otherwise is unacceptable and unfortunate and stokes more of the same.
Laine Welch has probably forgotten more about Alaskan fisheries than Jeff will ever know
“……….It is a smart thing to sit and talk with “adversaries” to improve understandings……….”
Does that principle also true with someone like Trump? Rail publicly against and entity, then meet to try to hammer out “a deal”?
When the quotas were established the combined villages got 10%. Big trawl industry has 90%. Lobbying included pulling the image villages over the trawlers heads like a cloak of virtue. I volunteered with Bering Sea Fisherman building pocket processing plant in Toksook Bay, a designated landing port for halibut. Industrial fishing not included, the villages made happy. No excuse, really, to receive just 10% share of resources. I also served on the Alaska Sustainable Salmon Policy commission and we found the bottom habitat perturbances by the pollock trawl fleet a serious problem for juveniles who grazed the benthic.
Agreed, Laine. Too many of the candidates for major State or Federal office sniff easy, populist votes by proclaiming themselves ‘anti-trawl’ when they don’t have an inkling about the complexities of the topic, or for that matter, what they could do about if elected.
To their credit, Peltola, Sullivan, and Murkowski are pretty well informed and each appear to have received well-informed technical briefings. But the governor candidstes? – what a pack of jokers. All of them.
Asking the wrong question here. What you should be asking is “why the fuck should anyone vote for Sullivan?”
“……….“why the fuck should anyone vote for Sullivan?”……….”
For the same reason why so many voted for Trump:
Because the alternative was absolutely unacceptable.
Well, sure, Harris wasn’t white enough for a lot of people.
Johnnie, what you’ve just written is one of the most insanely asinine things I have ever read. Nothing in your racist, fatuous response was even close to anything that could be considered a rational response. Everyone on this comment string is now dumber for having read it. Bless your heart.
Wasn’t smart enough, either. But mostly, who wants another president shell with an unknown cabal behind them running affairs?
There are millions of people right here in the US of A that would never vote for a black woman no matter who she is and who she’s running against. If you want me to pretend that isn’t true just to make you happy then you’re nuts.
There are millions of people right here in the US of A that would never vote for a white man no matter who he is and who he’s running against. We’ve seen them proclaim such on TV at “peaceful protests”. It’s their vote……….if they bother to vote at all.