The Sunday Minefield – December 7, 2025

Christmas is just over two weeks away! 2026 will be here before we know it. The Alaska Republican Party met and decided on names to send to Governor Mike Dunleavy (R – Alaska) to fill the two vacant Mat-Su Valley House seats. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R – Alaska) held her annual holiday lunch in Anchorage this week at the Marriott and took questions from the media after. Governor Dunleavy’s proposed FY2027 budget is due by December 15. And the Anchorage Assembly heard public testimony on Mayor Suzanne LaFrance’s proposed sales tax. 

A friendly message and reminder to all our readers. The Landmine is made possible by myself and a team of awesome Alaskans. I have been covering the legislative session in Juneau for the last seven years and returned from Juneau in May. I will be heading back this January. If you enjoy the content we provide, please consider making a one time or recurring monthly donation. You can click here to donate. We have a system that makes it super easy. We would really appreciate it. And thanks to everyone who has been supportive. 

Lower oil prices could compound deficit issues

The following is an excerpt from this week’s edition of the Alaska Political Report. You can click here for more information about the Political Report. A subscription is $1,299/year per organization. Discounted pricing is available for non-profits and government entities. Our coverage of the budget starts with the governor’s proposed budget, and we track everything in detail through the entire process. If you have any questions or would like to subscribe, please email jeff@akpoliticalreport.com.

Outside of a spike in late-July, oil prices have continued a downwards trend since the start of the fiscal year. The official projection released last spring was $68 per barrel and, as of Dec. 2, price has averaged just over that level year to date. If prices continue to hold at the current level, in the mid-60s, we can expect an average very close to the unofficial forecast released by the Department of Revenue in June. That forecast projected a downward revenue adjustment of $220 million from the spring forecast. The budget as passed had a projected surplus of $130 million. The revenue downturn could result in a current year deficit of $90 million.

Our September edition detailed roughly $190 million in potential supplemental needs, some guaranteed and others speculative, for FY2026. Since then, the Gov. Mike Dunleavy (R-AK) has released another fire declaration requiring an additional $25 million in spending on fire suppression. This brings the estimated supplemental need to $215 million. This leaves a potential $305 million hole in the FY2026 budget.

FY2027 Budget

Looking forward to FY2027, Gov. Dunleavy continues to face the same fiscal imbalance that has plagued the last seven years of his administration. The FY2027 Budget and 10-Year plan, due by Monday Dec. 15, are his last opportunity to put forward a meaningful solution to these challenges.

There are a few factors working in his favor this year. The percent of market value (POMV) transfer for FY2027 will be $4.0 billion, a $200 million increase from FY2026. Additionally, the statutory Permanent Fund Dividend (PFD) for FY2027, the Governor’s political white whale, is projected to cost $2.3 billion, $200 million less than the PFD included in his FY2026 budget proposal. That’s likely where the good news ends though.

Official revenue forecasts will be released alongside the budget. The forecast price will be based on a rolling average of the futures market this week. That could put the official oil price forecast in the low $60s or high $50s. This would put total projected revenue around $6 billion.

There is also significant pressure Dunleavy will face on the spending side. His budget vetoes significantly short-funded highway maintenance and wildfire suppression; by $62 million and $55 million, respectively. On top of that the actuarial rates for the state’s retirement system, approved by the Alaska Retirement Management Board, could add $75 million UGF to the state budget. That’s almost $200 million in budget increases before addressing cost shifts to the state from recent changes at the federal level.

Dunleavy has shied away from significant fiscal policy in the last few years; if he continues that trend (and includes a full statutory divined for FY2027) we should expect him to deliver the Legislature a budget with a deficit in the range of $1.5 to $2 billion for FY2026 and FY2027. That’s roughly 50% to 60% of the $3.2 billion left in the Constitutional Budget Reserve (CBR).

We expect Dunleavy to release his proposed FY2027 budget on either Friday Dec. 12 or Monday Dec. 15. We will have a comprehensive breakdown of his proposed budget in a special edition of the Political Report after it is released.

Vacant Mat-Su House seats 

Republicans in Districts 26 and 29 met today to decide on names to send to Governor Dunleavy to fill the vacant House seats left by now-Senators Cathy Tilton (R – Wasilla) and George Rauscher (R – Sutton). You can see the names below. Dunleavy is not required to pick from the names sent to him.

For Rauscher’s vacant seat, he is supporting Garret Nelson. Interestingly, former Representative Jesse Sumner was one of the people who applied for Rauscher’s vacant seat, but his name was not moved forward. It will be interesting to see if Sumner decides to run for the House seat, or possibly even challenge Rauscher.   

For Tilton’s vacant seat, she is staying out of it. Steve St. Clair previously worked for her a a legislative staffer. 

Whoever Dunleavy chooses to fill the vacant seats needs to be confirmed by a majority of House Republicans. Who he chooses with the ongoing drama within the Republican House minority will be interesting. Will he choose candidates aligned with Representative DeLena Johnson’s (R – Palmer) more moderate GOP faction, or Representative Kevin McCabe’s (R – Big Lake) more conservative group? 

Johnson’s faction already has enough votes to keep her as minority leader — and, by extension, the votes to confirm — or reject — whomever Dunleavy appoints to the seats. McCabe’s faction, which is closely aligned with Dunleavy, has five members. If the governor’s appointees are aligned with McCabe, he would gain two more votes.  

It’s unlikely Republicans would reject anyone Dunleavy chooses to fill the seats, as it would create even more political drama for Republicans. But if he chooses people who are unhappy with how Johnson was elected minority leader, things could get even more fractious within the Republican House minority. 

McCabe said he is considering resigning from the minority over the issue. If McCabe and just one other person were to leave the minority, their numbers would fall to 17 from 19 — meaning that, according to House rules, the remaining Johnson-led minority would lose one of its seats on seven-member committees that include state affairs, education, and judiciary. If just one member leaves the minority, it would lose a seat on the finance committee. 

But it’s unlikely one member would leave. If there is an exodus, it would likely be by the entire McCabe faction or no one at all.

Things are sure to get very loose when the committee on committees meets after session starts. Thee committee will need to decide who will replace Tilton and Rauscher on their committees, and potentially replace minority members on other committees if the minority loses members. 

Other Happenings 

Alaska Resource Education decided to delete my Facebook comment! Assume it was Beki Touissant herself. How she came to be the new executive director is disgusting. I will no longer be financially supporting ARE, and I know I am not alone. It’s shameful what they did to Ella Ede, the previous executive director. It will be fun to watch the dumpster fire that is sure to come with Beki at the helm.  

The Anchorage Assembly heard hours of public testimony on Tuesday (12/2/2025) on Mayor LaFrance’s proposed 3% sales tax. One of the testifiers was Republican gubernational candidate Treg Taylor, who is against the tax. He then posted his testimony on his campaign Facebook page. It’s so cringy when candidates for public office give public testimony at the Assembly or Legislature then post it on their campaign page. The Assembly voted to continue public testimony to their January 13 meeting. If they pass the sales tax measure, voters would also need to approve it. That question would likely be on the April municipal ballot for Assembly and school board races.  

Senator Murkowski took questions from the media following her annual holiday lunch. She said a short term extension is needed for healthcare tax credits for the exchange, but the bigger issue is the general cost of healthcare. She said she supports strikes on drug boats but feels the mission needs to be clear, and it could be more about regime change in Venezuela than stopping drugs as much of the cocaine on those boats is headed to Europe. And she said President Donald Trump is making it clear that Venezuela President Nicolás Maduro’s time is limited and he may be smart to seek a save haven. There’s been talk he may be looking to bail to Qatar.

This Week’s Loose Unit

This week’s Loose Unit takes us to the Mat-Su Valley. This week’s Loose Unit is the City of Palmer, with a special mention for City Manager Kolby Hickel Zerkel.

The contract for managing the Palmer Golf Course expires on December 31. George Collum has had the contract to operate the golf course for 18 years. Prior to that was the deputy director for seven years. Up until now there has never been an issue with the contract. 

The Palmer Golf Course is popular and makes money for the city. But now that Kolby Hickel Zerkel is the city manager, it appears the contract and the golf course itself are in jeopardy. Since October, the Palmer City Council has been aware the contract expires on December 31. They directed Hickel Zerkel to work to get the contract renewed, but according to her and Mayor Jim Cooper, the directions have been conflicting. She told me they are planning on releasing an RFP for the contract, but it won’t be done before the contract expires. Very loose. And just think about how many people in Alaska are going to respond to an RFP to manage a golf course in Palmer? My guess is not many. By all accounts, the current longtime operator has been doing a great job.  

There is also a narrative being pushed by Cooper and Hickel Zerkel that the Federal Aviation Administration could be responsible for the contract issue. But they have known about that since at least July. There has never been an issue with the FAA and the golf course, until now. It’s interesting that Hickel Zerkel’s husband, Keenan Zerkel, is in the aviation business, and Roger Hickel has a whole section on the website of his business, Roger Hickel Contacting, about his work in aviation. Maybe it’s just a coincidence! 

The original post listed Roger Hickel as Kolby Hickel Zerkel’s uncle. That was incorrect. Kolby is his first cousin’s daughter. Roger sent the Landmine the following statement: 

I was offended by your recent inference that I had something to do with the Palmer Golf Course RFP. I’m an avid golfer and feel George Collum has done an excellent job managing the Palmer golf course for the past 18 years. Kolby Hickel Zerkel is my first cousin‘s daughter. I haven’t talked to her in over two years. If Palmer did expand the airport, it would be a public bid process with award going to the low bidder. Please correct your fake news.

If the contract expires on December 31, there will not be an operator. And if the City of Palmer decides to go the RFP route, that will take several months. A lot of work happens in the winter and spring from getting golf tournaments on the schedule to ordering equipment. The golf course also employs around 50 people during the season. The whole situation is extremely loose. Leave it to government to fuck up a contract that actually makes money. But maybe there is more to the story. Classic Loose Unit behavior. 

The December 16 Palmer City Council meeting is sure to get loose. A lot of people are very pissed off about this maximum loose, and totally avoidable, situation. 

If you have a nomination for this week’s Loose Unit, or if you have any political news, stories or gossip (or any old pics of politicians or public officials) please email me at jeff@alaskalandmine.com.   

Subscribe
Notify of

93 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Reggie Taylor
20 days ago

“…….. Leave it to government to fuck up a contract that actually makes money. But maybe there is more to the story. Classic Loose Unit behavior……….” Where did I read about a Palmer airport expansion? Maybe a passenger terminal? Or a longer runway? Maybe an expanded forestry presence? McCabe has an airport fetish for Willow or Wasilla. I remember hearing decades ago of some dreaming for a new cargo airport on the Pt. MacKenzie farms to align with the port and railroad tie, and McCabe is all over that railroad tie right now. Looks to me like the Big Dreamers are at it… Read more »

Mike
19 days ago
Reply to  Reggie Taylor

Follow the money. The corrupt McCabe isn’t “all over” anything unless there’s a buck in it for him. He and his wife constantly pump the rail link on Twitter from their many fake name accounts.

Reggie Taylor
19 days ago
Reply to  Mike

I don’t see any money, but I do see Mikes, Marks, and JJ’s. Is this Mike Widney or Mike Alexander…………or all of you the same person with “fake names”?

Mark Kelsey
18 days ago
Reply to  Mike

You got that right. Both McCabes are prolific users of anonymous social media accounts to troll and bully anyone they don’t like. It’s dishonest behavior that is strikingly similar to what “Reggie” does here.

Bob Smith
18 days ago
Reply to  Mike

Hi “Mike” (Mark Kelsey)! Getting clever now I see… lol

FAA Pro
18 days ago
Reply to  Reggie Taylor

It is not an expansion of services. There is no data driven need- there is an admitted revenue issue at the airport and they are eyeing the golf course land to try to fix the issue. The airport carried a 1.5 million dollar loss for three consecutive years. They have empty hangars, vacant land and no commercial requests. In the new masterplan the airport usage will be reviewed to see if they meet the BII or BIII designation. They were at a 1/3 of full capacity back in 2015 and with small aviation declining in AK with RAVN and Kenai… Read more »

Hugh Wade
20 days ago

Thanks for breaking this fight down in Palmer. It all seems so predictable. The Airport, in the end, is a much bigger economic driver than the golf course. Contracts are contracts. Palmer is, as we know, a tight little self-contained unit. I am unaware how much land the City of Palmer owns or doesn’t own. The logical move is to find, if possible, a location for a new golf course. The land under the golf course was essentially land banked and utilitzed with an interim use: the golf course. Until the airport was ready to expand. The airport is ready… Read more »

Akindependent
19 days ago
Reply to  Hugh Wade

Can you prove that the Palmer airport has more economic impact for the people of Palmer? Because once the FAA turns off the spicket of grants (considering the $38 trillion federal deficit and its impending inability to give anyone money), where does the money come from? The sacrificing of other funding priorities that make Palmer a desirable place to live, to give money for one user group? I guess I just see this differently. Golf grew by 1.5 million players last year, licensed pilots grew by 10,000. There’s more than 700 airports in Alaska, there’s 6 championship golf courses. Alaska… Read more »

Dan Svatass
19 days ago
Reply to  Akindependent

What are you talking about? Licensed pilots in the US are up 44% since 2015, to almost 900,000. faaDOTgov/media/90441 Recall that Palmer had to pay the Feds just shy of $1 million last decade for chronically undercharging non-aviation businesses, including the golf course, for the airport land they occupied. “[T]he complaint says that the city used airport money to buy a city road grader, and used revenues from the 18-hole Palmer Golf Course on airport property to make payments for unrelated city bond debt. The complaint also charges that the city didn’t collect enough rent for airport space put to… Read more »

Reverend Paradox Mustachio Downingfield
19 days ago
Reply to  Dan Svatass

Maybe they meant it’s a sticky wicket of grants

Akindependent
19 days ago
Reply to  Dan Svatass

Read what I said…I didn’t say pilots grew 10,000 since 2015, I said from 2023 to 2024. https://www.faa.gov/media/90441 Pilot Total w/o Student Category 1/ 503,275 490,470… Most student pilots quit due to cost/time/other priorities. You can’t consider them “certified pilots” It wasn’t $1 million, it was $875,000. Read the article…Not necessarily because of the golf course, but because the city built hangars that were used for non-aeronautical businesses which clearly deviated from the use of aeronautically designated land. The city also tried to hide the revenue diversion which had nothing to do with the golf course. You are not paying… Read more »

Dan Svatass
18 days ago
Reply to  Akindependent

I’ll be as brief as I can. I never claimed that YOU SAID that pilots increased just 10,000 from 2015 to 2024. I said that pilots increased by 44% over that span, to nearly 900,000. You’re being incredibly deceptive in excluding certificated student pilots. Yes, the largest number of pilots hold student certificates. So what? They’re certificated pilots. There were 590,039 certificated pilots in 2015. By 2024 that figure was 848,770. A massive increase in the number of certificated pilots. Nearly 26,000 per year on average, not 10,000. I never said the settlement was for $1 million. I said it… Read more »

Akindependent
18 days ago
Reply to  Dan Svatass

If they were “certified” pilots, they wouldn’t be excluded in any number. That doesn’t make any sense. They are licensed to fly in a training program nothing else. They can’t take anyone other than an instructor. So they aren’t a certified private pilot? But they aren’t a beginner? Seems like a big difference between a license and paying to go on a fun ride. Just because you say “Just shy” of $1 million doesn’t make it anything less than an incorrect statement. Would you call $125,000 dollars an insignificant amount of money if it was deposited into your personal bank… Read more »

FAA Pro
18 days ago
Reply to  Dan Svatass

The airport carried a 1.5 million loss for 3 years through 2024. Their own advisory meetings show they are looking at the golf course for revenue not for documented aviation or transposition needs. They still have plenty of land, empty hangars and no pending commercial requests. Small scale aviation is declining in Alaska especially with RAVN and Kenai aviation shuttering. The city of Palmer did get into trouble with the FAA but it had nothing to do with the operator running the club house and greens keeping. The city leases the land from the airport and they pay a company… Read more »

Dan Svatass
18 days ago
Reply to  FAA Pro

Correct.

The feds sued the City of Palmer for leasing the land far below market rates, which is against the terms of the grant, which is designed to make the airport self-supporting. The feds also sued Palmer for diverting much of what revenue the airport did generate to pay non-airport municipal debts, also in violation of the federal grants. And of course Palmer lied about all this for years.

The only party that defrauded the feds was the City of Palmer. And it’s the city that had to pay nearly a million bucks in settlement.

Reggie Taylor
19 days ago
Reply to  Akindependent

“………once the FAA turns off the spicket of grants (considering the $38 trillion federal deficit and its impending inability to give anyone money), where does the money come from?………”

I guess when the U.S. government collapses, everybody is going to go golfing? Really?

Yeah, you most definitely see this differently.

Akindependent
18 days ago
Reply to  Reggie Taylor

And you think everyone is going to go flying before using a public space? Give me a break…enjoy that thought process.

Reggie Taylor
18 days ago
Reply to  Akindependent

“………And you think everyone is going to go flying before using a public space?……..”

I don’t care if private individuals fly or golf……..or not. The Palmer airport is the aerial hub for the state Division of Forestry for the region. Wildfire fighting, both support for ground fire fighting and fire suppression aircraft, occur there. The Forestry footprint at the Palmer airport has grown tight, and the firefighting effort and support from there for the other regions has grown.

Golf? It’s fun. I guess. I have a bag of clubs. Maybe I’ll go this weekend before Christmas week. See you there?

FAA Pro
18 days ago
Reply to  Reggie Taylor

Golfing is at least affordable and free putting/chipping and range for kids. GA is out of reach for most everyone.

Reggie Taylor
18 days ago
Reply to  FAA Pro

“……..Golfing is at least affordable……..”

So is hiking. So now lets all cry about the cost of maintaining trails.

FAA Pro
18 days ago
Reply to  Reggie Taylor

Why not- let’s start with snowmachining access and trapping.

The footprint for Forestery has not grown smaller. They have a 99 year lease with portions of it non aeronautical from the office building and parking for their vehicles. The airport lacks efficient design in its current space.

Reggie Taylor
17 days ago
Reply to  FAA Pro

“……..Why not- let’s start with snowmachining access and trapping……..”

Okay. Why can’t I snowmobile through the golf course to access the Matanuska/Knik Rivers public lands? It’s “public lands”, correct? Nobody but you and me want to golf there in December, right? Why can’t a 50′ corridor be established to access the river flats there?

Trapping the public lands in Matanuska/Knik River flats? Yeah, that’s an old struggle, but nobody cares except the dog walkers.

Hugh Wade
18 days ago
Reply to  Akindependent

Just in jobs and support, corollary businesses alone.

Akindependent
18 days ago
Reply to  Hugh Wade

I appreciate that. I think both industries do…manufacturing (airplane manufacturing/golf club manufacturing, paving/dirtwork, staffing…etc)

Both industries have a lot of overlap. It would be difficult to measure the corollary effect alone of both industries. It just seems revenue diversification would make relevant sense and for both to contribute in the event of collapse from one industry to another.

Hugh Wade
14 days ago
Reply to  Akindependent

An airfield and all it does is infrastructure, like roads, schools, public facilities,etc. I guess a golf course is infrastructure, too. However, they are in a different class, in my opinion, and the whole bent to say that they overlap and are equivalent in economic impact is likely a big reach. I don’t know. I don’t have data. But if a person just looks at density, and economic activity on the land being used for each case, it seems like an airport (transportation) is, without question, a lot more substantial. I’m sure golf boosters can strongly deny this, and that… Read more »

Akindependent
18 days ago
Reply to  Hugh Wade

And I appreciate you saying that this was handled loosely. That seems to be the biggest controversy of the entire decision.

FAA Pro
18 days ago
Reply to  Hugh Wade

Need for expansion cannot be driven by debt repayment financial need or desire. Expansion need has to be data driven. There is no data driven need for the airport to expand- they still have 13 acres available, empty hangars and no pending commercial requests. The golf course is also Federally protected under DOT (4) as public recreation.

Reggie Taylor
18 days ago
Reply to  FAA Pro

“……..The golf course is also Federally protected under DOT (4) as public recreation……..”

What?! Please narrow your citation down. What is “DOT (4)”

FAA Pro
18 days ago
Reply to  Reggie Taylor

The Department of Transportation Act 4(F) protects public recreation from transportation projects. All other avenues have to be investigated first before recreation land can be used.

Reggie Taylor
17 days ago
Reply to  FAA Pro

“………The Department of Transportation Act 4(F) protects public recreation from transportation projects. ……..” I read the law. It protects “………Publicly owned parks, recreation areas of national, state, or local significance. *Publicly owned wildlife & waterfowl refuges. *Publicly or privately owned historic sites listed on or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. ……..* The intent isn’t to stop the expansion of an airport on airport owned land leased for use as a golf course until needed for airport use. Nor is it in place to redefine contract law. You just proved yourself to be a Kelsey-type clone, fully willing… Read more »

FAA Pro
17 days ago
Reply to  Reggie Taylor

It’s documented in the current airport master plan and covers public golf courses. Please read the current master plan Vol 1 and 2 on the city website.

Reggie Taylor
17 days ago
Reply to  FAA Pro

Much of this brouhaha is the Palmer decision to create a new airport master plan this summer, pressured by the FAA demands and fines.

Frank Rast
17 days ago
Reply to  FAA Pro

I believe under the NEPA process 4f applies to land outside of the airport boundary and can be acquired if the airport expansion is a higher need than the 4f lands and the damage mitigated. In other words if the airport was expanding over a golf course the airport could develop a golf course somewhere else, or relocate the airport if that was less environmentally damaging. Land within the airport boundary is already environmentally cleared for development under FAA guidelines, so mitigation would not be required. From the newspaper article it appears the airport loses about $20,000/yr and the golf… Read more »

FAA Pro
17 days ago
Reply to  Frank Rast

It’s complicated. The current master plan outlines that attempting to utilize the golf course land would require a full analysis (golf course conversion was analyzed in 2015 plan c but was not chosen). It does mention relocation of the golf course to Outer Springer. The airports revenue issues are very well documented in the current master plan, the budget documents and the airport commission notes. They are eyeing the course for a revenue issue not aeronautical need. The golf course is not a commercial non-aeronautical tenant. FMV does not apply. The golf course is recreational land approved nominal rent by… Read more »

Reggie Taylor
17 days ago
Reply to  FAA Pro

“…….. The golf course is recreational land approved nominal rent by the 2010 FAA consent decree (last pages of the current Master Plan Vol 2). It has its own set of rules and the city is attempting to make a land conversion……..”

What?! So the FAA fine for charging less to the golf course was the result of a previously FAA approved nominal rent price? What “conversion” by the city are you referring to?

FAA Pro
16 days ago
Reply to  Reggie Taylor

It was roughly 857K (130 K for the whistleblower) for 10 major discrepancies in the handling of airport land-basically the city wasn’t paying the airport any rent for use of the land as per the grant assurances (it included the golf course, the nutrition services building, baseball fields, pump stations) and diversion of airport funds for equipment. In 2010 the FAA authorized the golf course as interim use recreational land for nominal rent. Nothing has changed since then- no decrees, no fines, no compliance issues that anyone is aware of. Nothing is airport advisory meeting notes or council meetings. The… Read more »

Reggie Taylor
16 days ago
Reply to  FAA Pro

“………It appears that city staff are now trying to convert the FAA approved interim use recreation land to a non-aeronautical commercial tenant. 
The city is attempting to convert the nominal lease rate to a full non aeronautical commercial lease for 144 acres to .11 cents per square foot………”

This from a whistleblower?

Roger Hickel
19 days ago

I’m an avid golfer and think George Collum has done a great job managing the Palmer Golf Course this past 18 years. I’m not Colby Hickel Zerkel’s uncle. She’s my first cousin’s daughter. I resent the inference that I had something to do with the Palmer Golf Course management RFP. Roger Hickel Contracting has completed numerous projects at Anchorage International Airport for the Alaska Department of Transportation, Federal Express, UPS, Everts Air Cargo, Alaska Airlines, Northern Air Cargo and others. Please redact the comment.
Roger Hickel

Just Me
19 days ago
Reply to  Roger Hickel

Typical Landfield: Not really concerned about accuracy. Another libel suit brewing?

Reverend Paradox Mustachio Downingfield
19 days ago
Reply to  Just Me

Jeff is the OG of Loose Units

Dan Svatass
19 days ago

The land for the Palmer Airport was federal land. It was granted to the city on the condition that it be used for an airport. For decades, the land was far more than Palmer needed for airport purposes. And so the feds let Palmer generate income from the excess land by hosting a golf course and other income-generating non-aviation activities there. Perfectly sensible. In recent years, however, new airport projects have arisen, and there’s potential airport use for the golf course land. And so Palmer is honoring its obligation to make that land usable for the aviation purposes it was… Read more »

Bob Smith
19 days ago
Reply to  Dan Svatass

It’s easy to write without swearing when you know what’s going on.
Try telling that to your friend Mark Kelsey next time you talk to him when you can!

Reggie Taylor
19 days ago
Reply to  Dan Svatass

“………In recent years, however, new airport projects have arisen, and there’s potential airport use for the golf course land. And so Palmer is honoring its obligation to make that land usable for the aviation purposes it was always meant to serve.
It’s easy to write without swearing when you know what’s going on………”

Well, I must admit being impressed. Pray tell of these “new airport projects” and the “potential airport use for the golf course land”. Don’t leave us in the dark.

FAA Pro
18 days ago
Reply to  Reggie Taylor

There are no new projects and no justification to close a revenue producing public asset for a float plane pond and more outdoor tie downs.

Dan Svatass
18 days ago
Reply to  FAA Pro

I agree. The most recent Airport Master Plan described some growth opportunities, but I see now that plan’s 9 years old.

Reggie Taylor
18 days ago
Reply to  FAA Pro

Are there plans for a float plane pond and more tie downs?

FAA Pro
18 days ago
Reply to  Reggie Taylor

The airport advisory commissions wish list. The airport has vacant land left, empty hangars and no pending commercial requests.

Mark Troutman
18 days ago
Reply to  Dan Svatass

Actually, the land where the Golf Course is located was a vegetable farm owned by Wendel Lewis. The City of Palmer purchased the farm land for Airport expansion.

Dan Svatass
18 days ago
Reply to  Mark Troutman

I did not know that, thank you. But understand that the money used to buy that land was almost certainly federal grants conditioned on the land being used for airport purposes. That’s how airports were built nationwide. And Palmer’s obligations are the same, whether the land was given by the feds, or purchased by the feds and given to Palmer, Palmer is bound to use the land to benefit aviation. The feds have long been fine with the airport using the land for a golf course. For decades, the airport was too large for the existing aviation demand. So if… Read more »

Reggie Taylor
18 days ago
Reply to  Dan Svatass

“……..if the airport could lease the land (max 10 year leases), it was permitted to……..”

So the current lease expires. Anybody know if it was a 10 year lease? Maybe it’s just being modified in length……..and lease amount? I don’t golf a lot, but if I remember correctly, it was cheaper than Settlers Bay and Sleepy Hollow.

FAA Pro
18 days ago
Reply to  Reggie Taylor

It is not an expiring lease. The consent decrees from the FAA states until data driven aviation need is found the course is permitted to run at nominal rent. The lease is between the city and the airport not the golf course operator who runs the clubhouse and mows the greens

Dan Svatass
18 days ago
Reply to  FAA Pro

That’s probably fair, since the airport is an entity of the city.

But the operator’s contract to run the course is certainly conditioned on the city’s power under the AIP grants to allow that non-aviation use to continue.

FAA Pro
18 days ago
Reply to  Dan Svatass

That’s inaccurate. The lease is between the city and the airport. Not the contractor who runs the clubhouse and cares for the greens. The city makes all the revenue from greens fees and the land usage.

Dan Svatass
18 days ago
Reply to  FAA Pro

As long as the city is paying the airport fair market value for the land, and the revenue is used solely on-airport and not misdirected again to other city debts, that’s fine.

FAA Pro
18 days ago
Reply to  Dan Svatass

The FAA consent decree allows the city to lease the land for nominal rent below FMV because the golf course (city) is not a non-aeronautical tenant. The course is public recreation land. The course lease to the airport has its own set of rules. The city pays 14.4K per year to the airport which increased from 5.4K initially. The consent decree allows the course to remain at nominal rent until there is a data backed aviation/transportation need which the airport does not have. The are several Fed hurdles the airport would have to go through to convert the land if… Read more »

Reggie Taylor
17 days ago
Reply to  FAA Pro

“……..As outlined in the current master plan ……..”

The city plans to develop a new airport master plan next year. That, as well as the conflict over the lease amount for the golf course with the FAA, probably explains the “conflicting” signals Zerkel refers to and which led to the golf course operation contract expiring before it was renewed.

FAA Pro
17 days ago
Reply to  Reggie Taylor

It appears city staff is attempting a land conversion from FAA approved recreational land to a non aeronautical commercial tenant charging FMV rent. The golf course is approved public recreation land with nominal rent allowed. Nothing has changed from the FAA. The Masterplan starts in January. Consultants will look at the current master plan and see what’s changed. Golf course conversion was looked at in 2015 and determined would cost the city 10-25 million then ( maybe 30-60 million now) and the city would have to pay all the upfront costs. The city doesn’t have any money- they just bonded… Read more »

Reggie Taylor
17 days ago
Reply to  FAA Pro

“……..It doesn’t make any sense……….”

Agreed. And all that led to a failure to renew the golf course operations contract. “Loose Unit”, as Landfield puts it.

All of Mat-Su (borough and cities) are facing some serious growth pressure right now, and it’s only going to grow down the road. The only question is how exponentially. I guess such pressures always bring problems with them.

FAA Pro
16 days ago
Reply to  Reggie Taylor

Agreed

FAA Pro
18 days ago
Reply to  Dan Svatass

There are no new airport projects. The airport has plenty of land left, empty hangars, no pending commercial requests and carried a 1.5 million loss for three years.

JJalaska
19 days ago

So the arsonist McCabe continues his efforts to inflame the recent division in the house minority caucus. It seems really misguided and silly of McCabe to want a do-over when there’s little chance the outcome will change and he will suffer the embarrassment of rejection a second time. To paraphrase a recent writer on Suzanne Downing’s blog, McCabe is not the adult in the room. He’s the reason that adults need to be there. Maybe his scorched-earth campaign will push some of those adults in that caucus into joining the majority. Rep. Ruffridge, for one, is too bright and too… Read more »

Just Me
19 days ago
Reply to  JJalaska

And maybe Rep. Nelson.

G.S.
19 days ago
Reply to  Just Me

Sadly, David Nelson is not running again. Unless things change for the better, we will be stuck with Clifford Groh who shows frequently that he only acts in ways that are to his personal benefit.

Dan Svatass
19 days ago
Reply to  G.S.

Can you substantiate this slur?

Or is this just how you roll?

Mark Kelsey
18 days ago
Reply to  G.S.

That can be said of many elected people. Although, as Rep. Kevin J. McCabe of Big Lake demonstrates regularly, some are much more blatantly self-serving.

Mark Kelsey
18 days ago
Reply to  Just Me

Yep. Nelson would be a great fit for the majority. So would some of the others. Ruffridge for sure. Bynum, Elam, Saddler, Stapp, and Coulombe would also work. How cool would it be to leave the extremist children playing with themselves in their own little sandbox, completely sidelined like their counterparts in the Senate?

Bob Smith
19 days ago
Reply to  JJalaska

Hi Mark Kelsey!

Mark Kelsey
18 days ago
Reply to  Bob Smith

Hi Reggie. Good to see you breaking in another fake name since you retired Chad. Looks like you’ve missed me. Do I owe any rent for the space I’m taking up in your head?

Bob Smith
18 days ago
Reply to  Mark Kelsey

Nope, just had to make sure the permanent record of this comment thread shows and confirms (as you just did, thank you btw) for everyone that you are also “JJalaska” and still enjoy poking at me and Reggie for “being anonymous cowards who have something to hide behind commenting with a fake name” while you pick and choose to do the exact same thing, that’s all I had baldy boy, now back to you!

Reggie Taylor
18 days ago
Reply to  Mark Kelsey

Hi, Editor! Hey, that Kevin McCabe is quite an effective leader, huh? We need twenty more just like “em!

Mark Kelsey
18 days ago
Reply to  Reggie Taylor

Effective leaders don’t attack, harass, and bully their colleagues. It’s kind of laughable to apply that term to someone who doesn’t even have the respect and support of a majority of his caucus. But kudos to you for finally admitting what’s been obvious all along — that you’re a McCabe supporter. Remember when you tried to sell the obvious BS that you didn’t support him or know anything about him? Almost as hysterical as you denying you hate natives, or that you’re one yourself, or that you live in Juneau. Overall unsurprising behavior from a dishonest anonymous coward hiding behind… Read more »

Bob Smith
18 days ago
Reply to  Mark Kelsey

Oh Mark, let’s try this one more time, through your stubborn and thick hairless head let’s try this – ME. AND. REGGIE. ARE. NOT. THE. SAME. PERSON. Clear enough?

Mark Kelsey
18 days ago
Reply to  Bob Smith

LMAO. Sure thing, “Reggie”. Now that you’ve added some juvenile name-calling, your claim is totally believable. Get back to me when you’re not cowering like a scared weakling behind a fake name because you have something to hide, okay?

Reggie Taylor
18 days ago
Reply to  Mark Kelsey

“……..LMAO. Sure thing, “Reggie”………”

How do you know that me, Bob, Chad, etc aren’t Kevin McCabe?

Reggie Taylor
18 days ago
Reply to  Mark Kelsey

“……..Effective leaders don’t attack, harass, and bully their colleagues……..”

Yeah, such behavior is reserved for “journalists”.

Mark Kelsey
17 days ago
Reply to  Reggie Taylor

Poor baby, “Reggie”. I’m glad we can agree that bullying is not a character trait of an effective leader.

Reggie Taylor
18 days ago
Reply to  Mark Kelsey

“…….. kudos to you for finally admitting what’s been obvious all along — that you’re a McCabe supporter. Remember when you tried to sell the obvious BS that you didn’t support him or know anything about him?……..”

I didn’t. Remember when I recently posted that I became a supporter because of the deranged hatred that is exhibited here? It’s like Trump Derangement Syndrome. If McCabe has the psychos pitted against him, he can’t be all bad!

Mark Kelsey
17 days ago
Reply to  Reggie Taylor

Good one, “Reggie.” I do remember that. It followed days and weeks of your obvious lies being exposed over several threads here, and the subsequent multiple shifts in your alleged personal narrative to accommodate the new lies and new fake names you cower behind, like an obvious coward with something to hide.

Remember how you claimed to know nothing about McCabe, but then appeared to be fluent in the details of the lawsuit against him, the APOC violations he committed, and the despicable ethics complaint he filed against two fellow Republicans?

Reggie Taylor
14 days ago
Reply to  Mark Kelsey

“………Remember how you claimed to know nothing about McCabe, but then appeared to be fluent in the details of the lawsuit against him………” Your political campaign has proved partially successful in that it forced me to read a few google search results. I immediately saw that it was you who was the plaintiff of a suit, and partially understood your psychosis. I then left the road controversy behind and googled you up. It was then I understood more. Your political attacks go way beyond road maintenance and upgrade funding, and include the comment sections of numerous Alaskan blogs and topics… Read more »

Mark Kelsey
13 days ago
Reply to  Reggie Taylor

Sure thing, “Reggie”. (wink wink) Awesome story. Totally credible.

Speaking of psychosis, how pathetically weak and desperate are you to imagine you’re fooling anyone?

Dan Svatass
19 days ago

“There has never been an issue with the FAA and the golf course, until now.” -Landfield, above, until he edits this again Landfield has no idea what he’s talking about Following an FAA investigation, Palmer had to pay the Feds just shy of $1 million last decade for chronically undercharging non-aviation businesses, including the golf course, for the airport land they occupied: “[T]he complaint says that the city used airport money to buy a city road grader, and used revenues from the 18-hole Palmer Golf Course on airport property to make payments for unrelated city bond debt. The complaint also… Read more »

FAA Pro
18 days ago
Reply to  Dan Svatass

It has nothing to do with the golf course operator who runs the clubhouse house and manages the greens. The city didn’t pay airport to use the land and a whistle blower told the rest of the story. The city did a lot of mismanagement with the airport lands- not the contractor that runs the golf course. Read the consent decree in the current masterplan on the city of Palmer website. Vol 2 last 7 pages.

Dan Svatass
18 days ago
Reply to  FAA Pro

No one accused the golf course operator of doing anything wrong.

What’s wrong is for Landfield to ignorantly claim that “There has never been an issue with the FAA and the golf course, until now.”

Ridiculous.

Mark Kelsey
18 days ago

Speaking of McCabe’s self-dealing, here he is abusing his position to try and hijack already allocated Big Lake road money to his road.

https://www.frontiersman.com/opinions/opinion-road-dispute-highlights-politics-public-process/article_757d9584-96a0-11ec-8988-d7fa8be56a99.html

Bob Smith
18 days ago
Reply to  Mark Kelsey

Wait, who and where exactly is speaking of McCabe?? I hope you know you’re commenting this publicly and not just writing hateful notes to yourself which I believe is what you intended… the Chrome tab and your notes app are not the same thing Mark, I repeat, the Chrome tab and your notes app are NOT the same thing!

Reggie Taylor
18 days ago
Reply to  Mark Kelsey

“……..here he is abusing his position to try and hijack already allocated Big Lake road money to his road………”

Where’s your vivid imagination, Editor? McCabe just has to be behind this nefarious airport/golf course thing, doesn’t he? Get with the blame game, Dude! You’re slacking! McCabe is stealing a golf course while you aren’t looking!

Mark Kelsey
17 days ago
Reply to  Reggie Taylor

Good to see you no longer try to deny McCabe’s greedy attempt to redirect that roads money to his road.

Reggie Taylor
14 days ago
Reply to  Mark Kelsey

I never did. I don’t know if he did or not, and I really don’t care. I’m just reacting to a psychotic former newspaper editor here, not a politician.

Mark Kelsey
13 days ago
Reply to  Reggie Taylor

Rep. Kevin J. McCabe of Big Lake did all of that. There’s no disputing it. If you could, you would. Instead, you go overboard, like a child, trying to discredit the messenger, just like McCabe does. I don’t believe you don’t care, either. You’re reacting, once again, in a very personal way. It’s almost as if you’re replying as him. Although it’s really hard to imagine that any public official, even someone as dishonest and self-dealing as McCabe, would spend as much time and energy as you do trolling an insignificant online message board while hiding like a coward behind… Read more »

Reggie Taylor
8 days ago
Reply to  Mark Kelsey

“……..you go overboard, like a child, trying to discredit the messenger……..”

You’re not a “messenger”. You’re a maniac. Why not try to focus on and be satisfied with your lawsuits and APOC complaints and let comment boards on other subjects remain about other subjects? Nobody needs to discredit you. You do it with abundant alacrity.

Mark Kelsey
18 days ago

This one is great, too. It shows the buffoonish and self-dealing McCabe trying to eliminate the state agency that was investigating him for illegally hiding campaign expenses. It contains the following passage: “From watching and listening to the proceedings, it appeared that Kevin McCabe decided that he didn’t need to know anything about Alaska election disclosure law before pretending to be an expert. He had no idea that the FEC has no role in state elections and no power to regulate state elections. Contrary to his claims, the APOC does not duplicate what the federal agency does. He was completely… Read more »

Mark Kelsey
18 days ago

It would be great to see Jesse Sumner back in the legislature. Juneau needs more smart, hard-working problem-solvers who do their homework before showing up.

Reggie Taylor
18 days ago
Reply to  Mark Kelsey

Didn’t he pass his throne down to his brother? I wonder if McCabe has a younger brother…………