Advertisement. For information about purchasing ads, please click here.

Americans for Prosperity

My thoughts after the legislative hearing on the University

On September 20, 2019, the Senate State Affairs Committee heard from the UAA Faculty Senate. I was there and listened. However, the Board of Regents is still best suited to decide about structuring the University of Alaska at this time.

First some context, then a comment. In a break from normal procedure, the State Affairs Committee was used to hear additional faculty voices. Those voices were appreciated, and I will consider them in this priority: First, constitutionally, then statutorily, and then budgetary.

The Board of Regents has the primary duty to own and manage our University. Legislators have a duty to fund and describe by law the outline of the university. The Governor has the power of veto and proposal.

Advertisement. For information about purchasing ads, please click here.


The state is small in population and large in geography, as well as diverse in its culture and economy. Each campus has taken on different missions that complement our communities and should complement a unified but diverse U of A system.

The September 20, 2019 hearing was informative, and there were many credible speakers (including Dr. Forrest Nabors, together with faculty). There is a general consensus on a few areas, namely that the Alaska Constitution, Article VII, Sections 2 (“The University of Alaska is hereby established as the state university…”) and 3 (“The University of Alaska shall be governed by a board of regents…”) represent the controlling authority.

Presently, under that controlling authority, information is being collected and circulated by relevant decision makers. The Board of Regents met in Anchorage on September 12-13, 2019. Public testimony was collected, both from Anchorage and around the state. Additional opportunities for public testimony are here. There is a scheduled Board of Regents meeting in Fairbanks on November 7-8, 2019 as well.

As we go through this period of history, it’s important to remember: This is about all Alaska; not just one community, or one community versus another. The University of Alaska, to be fair, just like all of us, should be looking at “how we can do it better.” But, that’s a disciplined process. A process found in our State Constitution.

In my view, at this time, structural changes to our university system primarily rest with the decisions by the University of Alaska Board of Regents (which know the complexities of our university system). The Legislature has had a role, prior to September 20, and that occurred when the legislature inserted intent language in this year’s budget. The intent language tasked the Board of Regents with looking at all issues related to consolidation and the different campuses. The due date for that board report is December 1, 2019.

Before the legislature does anything, if anything at all, about structuring, it may be wise to see what that report says. Let’s allow the Board of Regents to do their work, pursuant to their authority, for the benefit of the entire University of Alaska system.

Senator John Coghill (R – North Pole) represents Senate District B. He has served in the Alaska Legislature since 1999. 

Advertisement. For information about purchasing ads, please click here.


Enjoy this article? Please consider making a donation to the Alaska Landmine. The Landmine is made possible by a team of Alaskans who work hard to deliver unique content you won’t find anywhere else. Your donations make articles like this possible. Thank you for reading!

Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
1 year ago

Never expected JohnJohn to become a respected statesman, but he is doing a nice job in 2019! Now he just needs some work on his grammar 😉

1 year ago

A voice of reason in the time of insanity.

Computing, Engineering, and Technology
1 year ago

TLP: White wasnt the UA System put in check by NWCCU? Perhaps, the Constitution of the United States of America has answers to the problems Alaska faces. What can be inferred from that document about the way Alaska has behaved over the last 20 years? How has the economy of goods and services improved? How has miss spending effected the people it represents? How are CAS being improved to better coming generations? What remedies have been offered for the current CAS problem? Shall Computing, Engineering, and Technology remind Alaskans that its system purchased a new coal power plant (innovation!), overran… Read more »

1 year ago

Had effective legislative fiscal oversight of the University been taking place when the money was “rolling in” we wouldn’t be where we are. Anyway, encouraging to see some elected officials are beyond “denial” of the fiscal reality and coming to their senses now. (that does not include the “statutory PFD” crowd)