Yesterday, Anchorage Mayor Suzanne LaFrance held a press conference on public safety at the Anchorage Fire Department training center in Airport Heights. She was joined by multiple city officials, including Municipal Manager Becky Windt Pearson, Municipal Attorney Eva Gardner, Police Chief Sean Case, Fire Chief Doug Schrage, and Homeless Coordinator Farina Brown.
LaFrance opened a 13-minute prepared statement by saying, “Keeping the public safe is my number one responsibility as mayor, and I take this very seriously.”
LaFrance has been mayor for two and a half months. Before running for mayor, she spent six years on the Anchorage Assembly, where she served as chair for two. She is aware of the homelessness and public camping problem in Anchorage, and made solving those problems a centerpiece of her campaign.
Since taking office on July 1, the LaFrance administration has abated at least two large and dangerous camps, including, most notably, the camp at Fairbanks St. and 42nd Avenue by Home Depot. This came after months of public outcry due to a murder and massive disruptions to area businesses.
The bulk of the people camping on Fairbanks St. and 42nd Avenue moved nine blocks north to 33rd Ave, by Moose’s Tooth.
In a draft strategy document published yesterday, the LaFrance administration stated that they intend to provide 500 shelter beds over the winter–enough to house every homeless person in Anchorage this winter. However, a consistent problem for those attempting to abate camps and move people into shelter is that many homeless individuals simply refuse to go.
In the Landmine’s latest video about homelessness, “Somehow, This is Still Anchorage,” we were repeatedly told by people camping in the woods or in parks that they would refuse shelter if offered and that the majority of homeless campers would do the same. One individual stated that she had a home, but preferred living in the camps in the woods with her friends.
In Seattle, data shows that about half of homeless individuals refuse shelter when offered.
This begs the question: what is the LaFrance administration’s position on those who choose to camp and live in public spaces and refuse help or shelter?
I asked this question at the press conference. It was clear the question made everyone on the stage uncomfortable. Eventually, Farina Brown, LaFrance’s homeless coordinator, took the question. She stated that, “The policy is being homeless is not illegal.” She then spoke about of all of the available resources, but acknowledged that some people don’t want shelter, and said, “We will honor and respect that.”
Read that last part again.
I was surprised by the claim that the city would “honor and respect” the choice by campers to refuse shelter and continue to camp in Anchorage’s public spaces.
Brown finished by saying people who choose to camp outside in public areas but engage in criminal activity “will be met with a public safety response.”
Later, I was able to ask a follow-up question. I asked Brown to clarify whether people camping in public areas and not overtly committing crimes are just allowed to stay there.
Brown responded evasively, stating that she is not a law enforcement officer and that community members who observe crime should call 911 for emergency or 311 for non-emergency.
I was able to chat a bit with Brown after the press conference. I pointed out that municipal code prohibits people from engaging in many of the behaviors that go on in encampments. For reference, Anchorage Municipal Code 25.70.040 – “Prohibited activities generally” states:
A. Except in areas specifically designated for such use in accordance with law, no person may engage in any of the following activities on municipal land:
-
- Camping.
- Building fires.
- Operating motor vehicles of any kind.
- Constructing trails.
- Discharging firearms where there is a reasonable likelihood people, domestic animals, or property may be jeopardized.
- Shooting into municipal land from beyond its boundaries where there is a reasonable likelihood people, domestic animals, or property may be jeopardized.
- Cutting or otherwise damaging live trees, shrubbery, brush or other vegetation.
- Removing soil, rocks, gravel or plants of any kind.
- Constructing structures of any kind.
- Hunting or trapping of game animals.
Brown acknowledged the law, but told me addressing homelessness is a team effort and will require a lot of work. I asked her if she had been to the camps and told her about the drugs, used needles, alcohol, human waste, trash, and stolen goods I have seen. She said she has been to camps. If so, this begs a second set of questions: if the LaFrance administration is aware about what happens in the camps, then why aren’t they enforcing the laws there? Do they have the legal capacity to sanction illegal behavior, including camping itself?
Amanda Moser, LaFrance’s communications manager, was standing close by and recording my conversation with Brown. During the conversation, Moser suggested I talk to Anchorage Police officials to get the answers I was looking for. However, APD does not set policy regarding camp abatements, the mayor does. And it is already obvious to everyone that Anchorage Police do not enforce the laws on the books when it comes to camps in public spaces. APD generally turns a blind eye to the drug usage, theft, violence, and sexual assaults that occur in these camps on a constant basis.
After the press conference, LaFrance sent out a press release ending with, “Part of being at home means feeling secure. Everyone who lives in Anchorage deserves safe streets and trails.”
A lot of people in Anchorage don’t feel safe and secure using our parks and trails, or going to some parts of the city, because they have been overrun with encampments. These camps are illegal and they are dangerous and terrible environments, both for the people in them and for people who just want to use Anchorage’s public spaces.
It’s also worth noting that encampments are overwhelmingly located in middle and lower-income areas, such as Mountain View. A LaFrance administration decision to allow indefinite camping on public land means that Anchorage’s lower-income families will disproportionately bear the burden of losing safe use of public spaces, while Anchorage’s upper-income neighborhoods will remain largely (if not entirely) unaffected. For an administration that has repeatedly emphasized equity, this is a startling policy decision.
Would the administration sanction indefinite camping on public land if the camps were in, say, Rabbit Creek?
Former Anchorage Mayors Dave Bronson and Ethan Berkowitz, and former Acting Mayor Austin Quinn-Davidson, were all hamstrung by a 2018 Ninth Circuit decision, Martin v Boise, that prohibited cities from abating camps unless they had adequate shelter space. The U.S. Supreme Court recently overturned the Boise decision in City of Grants Pass v Johnson, thereby giving cities broad latitude to clear camps from public land regardless of shelter capacity.
However, based on its published materials the LaFrance administration would not even need to rely on the Grants Pass decision: it is openly stating that it intends to have enough shelter capacity for everyone who needs it but will allow individuals to simply reject shelter and continue living indefinitely on public lands anyway.
To the best of my knowledge, the LaFrance administration has never stated this view in public before, despite it being an absolutely central part of how our city responds to homelessness and illegal encampments. Should Anchorage residents expect to have camps in parks and trails indefinitely? Does our city really want to maintain and broadcast a policy that anyone can come to Anchorage, set up a camp in the woods, and just refuse any request to leave?
The nervousness and evasiveness I encountered yesterday suggests that the LaFrance administration is uncomfortable with this topic and is reluctant to make public statements about it. But the public deserves an answer to this basic question: how will the city respond to those who are offered help, and just say no?
It has been years since anyone has been able to safely use the park near my home because of the big and growing camp. Glad the LaFrance admin “honors and respects” these people’s choice to wreck and I mean WRECK my neighborhood green space. Does she also “honor and respect” the right of me and my neighbors to go on a walk in the park without fearing for our safety? Does she “honor and respect” right of kids to play outside without getting harassed by intoxicated adults who would rather live in squalor than get help? I guess this answers… Read more »
LOL if you voted for Suzanne, you’re getting what you deserve. Bronson was a hot mess but at least he wanted to move people into shelter. Enjoy your trashed dangerous parks and vote more wisely next time.
^^^^THIS 100% !!!^^^^
I could not have stated it better, thank you. Maybe Jeff could dig into the story behind the man who passed away back there. The story is that he was found with needles in his face, possibly killed by a violent man named “Frank”. The man had a job and was found when his boss came to check on him as he hadn’t showed up for work at the Bear Tooth.
You get what you voted for. Did you even bother to watch her at the so-called “debate”?
Let’s be real though, Dave Bronson’s attempt to fix homelessness was a terrible comedy of errors too. House them all in a giant circus tent? …that didn’t meet code? …that was comically expensive?…that had a foundation laid illegally, costing Anchorage $2.5 million? Yeah, Suzanne might not have been the best debater but at least she didn’t have to defend *that* record. Lordy.
https://www.alaskasnewssource.com/2023/06/17/anchorage-settles-multi-million-dollar-lawsuit-with-contractor/
Didn’t meet code??? Hmm, yet the same exact structure is used in this service elsewhere in other municipalities that have this problem. Better check your facts Chucky. Try starting by separating yourself from the FAKE news source you referenced.
And yet Anchorage voters keep passing bonds to upgrade the very parks and trails that the taxpayers can’t even use. At least the homeless have nicer campgrounds I guess. Yipee
I’m not surprised ADN nor KTUU have reported anything on this press conference…..nor any comment from a few of the most vocal assembly members. Shocking.
They don’t want to talk about this policy because they know it is extremely unpopular. They want people to think that they’re doing everything they can, and hope nobody asks too many questions. The fact is we have a left of center mayor with a very liberal staff and they believe that homeless people get to control the parks. Other residents who want to use parks for their intended purpose don’t have a say, in their view.
A competent exercise in JOURNALISM.
Well done. More, please.
The mistreatment of ordinary people in Anchorage just trying to raise families here is so gross. LaFrance would never accept people refusing shelter and setting up tents next to her home. You are right that if the camps were in rich parts of south side they would be dealt with very quickly. Funny how that works.
It’s Alaska, carry a gun and exercise your right to defend your person and property. If you feel your city is failing in it’s obligation to uphold the law and keep you safe, I’d suggest filling a class action suit against the city. Your taxes pay for public spaces and safety, if they have broken this contract with residents then residents should seek compensation instead of waiting for re-election. Elections don’t hold politicians accountable, people do.
Wrong.
I mean, elections are literally how the people hold politicians accountable. And if Suzanne doesn’t fix this (and maybe find a new homelessness czar too) she’ll likely lose the next one.
Hey Jeff,
Missing ask a cat article. Was it eaten by a Haitian? Asking for a friend.
Never read cat, but appreciated your comment
What % of homeless are mentally ill? How do we get them health care access?
Do you mean force them into healthcare? They are many of the ones who refuse services. Which leads us into the age-old dilemma of personal consent vs. public good. How do you convince a mentally ill paranoid person to submit to care? How incapacitated does someone have to be to force them into treatment against their will? That’s a big ol legal catch-22
Exactly…yet it is fine to claim those that refuse to decamp because of mental illness should be vilified? Jailed (who pays for those beds)? Or deserve violence? API is likely the best option.
ie I fully agree with you, but I have seen no actual solution(s) offered up with associated costs to deal with the mental health crisis that is often directly linked to homelessness.
The mayor is just answering questions in the same manner that Harris answers questions, a lot of talk but says nothing to answer a question. So now Anchorage has a mayor that is identical to our vice president, worthless. Can you see the similarity between illegal alien issue and homeless issue? All take no action. Good luck Anchorage, you will need it. You may want to start a recall now instead of later when the mayor makes everything worse.
Suzanne deserves more time, in general, before we pass judgement. She’s still only two months and twenty days into her administration. That is enough time to plan and bring people onboard but it’s not really enough time to put big plans into action. That said, her administration stating that they will be disregarding code and allowing indefinite camping in public parks is a huge red flag and potentially setting the stage for a legitimate recall. Mayors don’t get to declare that we will not follow code in Anchorage. That is a serious violation of the separation of powers. Suzanne was… Read more »
More time means the problem will just get worse. Everyone knows that. Leftists see the homeless as revenue to be harvested.
Being homeless should not be a crime however their should be expectations and rules governing how one should behave at such times. In particular I find the debris fields left by some homeless individuals to be most disturbing with the bodily waste being a close second. People, homeless or not produce these things and should have access to facilities to get rid of them properly. I suspect the mayor is tolerant of homelessness because even though she won’t publicly admit it, it’s the cheapest way to handle these people.
Being homeless isn’t a crime, but the condition of homelessness is not a license to commit crimes. Being homeless does not mean you get to camp wherever you want in parks, harass tourists, do drugs on the street, etc. If you are homeless and offered shelter, and you refuse and camp in a playground or baseball diamond instead… then yes you are violating Anchorage statute and you should be removed by APD. There’s no such thing as an acceptable camp in a public park. Doesn’t exist. Parks are parks, not places to offload the city’s people and problems.
Incoming on 5th Avenue right above the jail is what is starting to be a permanent tent camp. I imagine more than a hundred police cars drive by it daily. Best part – it’s on the same parcel as the jail! Just move the fence south a few yards and problem solved.
This article reads like an opinion piece and would help the general public if it were labeled as such
Which article isn’t an opinion piece these days? Read the words, follow up on sources, check the quotes, and make your own conclusions.
I’m not from around here. I live in Albuquerque, NM. I came up here on a semi-vacation. It’s a beautiful city you have here. I’m staying in an Airbnb on the north end of town. Every tick or noise I heard from this place at night for the first few nights, I thought someone was firing a gun or throwing rocks at my truck. I had seen a few homeless tents when driving into town and near my Airbnb. It’s almost been a week, and I’ve gotten used to it more or less. Look at the bright side. At least… Read more »
UNTIL YOU MAKE A PERMANENT SOLUTION THEY ARE GOING TO BE EVERYWHERE AND INCLUDING…. Your OWN YARDS!
Did you mean to yell “FINAL SOLUTION”?
I’m guessing yes.
Let’s be clear what is going on here, Suzanne LaFrance is telling the rest of Alaska that it is OK to send their homeless, addicted, and mentally ill people here, and that we will let them live in our parks forever if they want (what we residents want isn’t a consideration, it seems). Other communities are already doing this of course, but this is a public green light. Truly shameful.
There is more money to be made harvesting 1,000 than 500. Even better is 2,000.
I’ve lived in mountain view for a long time and our parks and trails haven’t been safe in years. I’ve also been homeless in the past and I don’t understand why these new camps are simply allowed to have trash, junk and random cars and things in the woods on top of being right next to parks and roadways. I always kept my camp small, clean and as far away from parks, roadways and trails as possible for my safety and the safety of the community. These new camps are right up in our faces and causing serious health and… Read more »