It is time to save the Port of Alaska

When I came into office, resolving the homelessness crisis in Anchorage was my number one priority. However, as my team and I assessed the dire situation at the Port of Alaska (PoA), it became quite clear that rebuilding and modernizing the Port had to become the chief focus of my administration.

I know Anchorage residents, and folks across our state, have heard about problems at the Port for many years. I’m not here to talk about past issues, mistakes made, or score any political points. I am focused on the future, ensuring food security for our state, and rebuilding our great Port of Alaska.

The PoA is the single most important piece of infrastructure in our state. Yes, we have the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS), world-class mines, the Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport, and other critical infrastructure that support commerce throughout our state. But without the Port of Alaska, none of these would be possible.

Why is the Port so essential to our economy and way of life as Alaskans? Here are a few pieces of information to consider when thinking about the Port of Alaska:

  • Ninety percent of Alaskans depend on goods handled by the PoA
  • Fifty percent of all cargo shipped into Alaska crosses the PoA
  • Annually, the PoA supports $14 billion worth of economic activity
  • It’s the only functioning tsunami proof port in Alaska
  • Eighty percent of cement used in Alaska crosses the PoA
  • All aviation gas for the state comes through the PoA

Unfortunately, the PoA is in dire need of significant repair and upgrades. Right now, 1,400 pilings supporting port structures are considered seismically unstable. Approximately 1,000 of those piles were reinforced with jackets in the past, but those repairs are nearing the end of their useful life. Cook Inlet’s harsh environment is rapidly corroding the piles and jackets. Recent engineering analysis indicates the docks may only have 6 to 8 years left of remaining life before vertical load capacity restrictions would have to be imposed.

The 7.1 magnitude earthquake that struck Southcentral in 2018 caused extensive damage to the PoA. As a result of that quake, 20 percent of the pilings at our newest dock – built in 1974 – failed.

The 2018 quake lasted 38 seconds. Some experts have informed us that, had it continued for another seven seconds, widespread liquefaction could have occurred, possibly leading to a total failure and collapse of one or more of the Port docks. Liquefaction occurs during an earthquake when the soil is shaken and mixed with enough water that it essentially becomes liquid, leaving it unable to support the dock.

It is hard to underestimate the destruction that losing the PoA would cause for our state. Roughly ninety percent of the food we consume in Alaska is imported, the majority coming across the PoA. On average, grocery stores have less than 6-days of food on hand. If we lose the PoA in an earthquake, and Matson and TOTE are unable to offload their ships, no food will be available in a matter of days. A society without food cannot function. Every household and business from Anchorage, to Bethel, to Kodiak, to the North Slope oil fields would be impacted if the Port fails.

Some have said that we could simply truck or fly in our food and supplies. This simply won’t be practical. Over 700, 747 cargo jets would be needed on a weekly basis to replace the food and goods that cross the PoA. As a former cargo pilot, I can tell you there aren’t enough idle jets in the world to fill that gap.

I know this is a stark picture to paint. I was just as concerned as you likely are when I learned of this situation. The time for addressing this problem is now. We cannot wait until a disaster happens to talk about fixing the Port.

The good news is that we have a broadly supported plan and vision for how to fix the PoA and get us to what I call food security for Alaska. There are two cargo docks at the PoA. Food security requires we have one-seismically resilient dock that can off-load goods and supplies like clockwork. Currently, we don’t have food security as both docks are seismically unstable.

The technology exists for us to construct seismically resilient cargo docks. The Petroleum and Cement Terminal, which will be fully completed this spring, withstood the 2018 earthquake by utilizing modern engineering technology and design. Our plan for the cargo docks will mimic this same design and technology.

The entire Port of Alaska Modernization Program is a $1.6 – 1.8 billion construction project. To get us to food security, which is one seismically resilient dock, we need $600 million.

The Municipality of Anchorage is requesting $600 million from the State of Alaska to rebuild PoA cargo dock #1. The Assembly and Port users are supportive of our plan. Recently, the Assembly and I approved a $165 million revenue bond to support this project. We have skin in the game; I am asking the Legislature and Governor Dunleavy to join in our efforts.

The people of Anchorage cannot do this alone. Alaskans must come together to fix the Port once and for all. Our economy depends on it. Our way of life depends on it. We must save the Port.

Dave Bronson has served as mayor of Anchorage since July 1, 2021. 

Subscribe
Notify of

9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lynn Willis
8 months ago

“To get us to food security, which is one seismically resilient dock, we need $600 million.” Who convinced Bronson there is such a thing as a “seismically resilient” dock? And if there is, how much “resilience” do you get for that kind of money? The Port of Anchorage/Alaska now sits about six miles from an active seismic fault that reminded us of being there 2018 and a couple of times since. Bronson might want to remember that old adage; “It isn’t nice to fool with Mother Nature” and how the Titanic was “unsinkable”. Put money into the ports in Seward… Read more »

Unknown
8 months ago
Reply to  Lynn Willis

I think we can all agree that if the port fails we’re all in a world of hurt. It’s good coverage for Bronson and clouds all the other shit he is doing. “Come on everybody get behind me abs this project so I can pay myself on the back.”

Lynn Willis
8 months ago
Reply to  Unknown

Yes. Also, Whittier and Seward both have an existing rail connection for moving cargo volume off the road and directly to the interior. This is more than “food security”. Lift the rock and I bet you will see both local unions and contractors “feathering their nests”. Can’t blame them yet Bronson is either “in on it” or too dense to see.

AK_Mama
8 months ago
Reply to  Lynn Willis

It’s not just about food security and certainly not about local unions * contractors feathering their nests. The Anchorage port is also utilized by Dept. Of Defense. Whittier is not a viable option due to its size & accessibility issues to the city. Seward could be but its use would increase the cost of goods. Items would need to be trucked in from Seward to Anchorage-distribution point to other locations in the SOA via Ted Stevens Airport. Anchorage port is approx. 8 miles from the airport in lieu of 128 miles from Seward. We are talking about ships with large… Read more »

Valerie
8 months ago

Well let’s save the port! It will also create more jobs! GO BRONSON!😊😊😊

floridawoman
8 months ago

It is time for Bronson, who is openly anti-semitic to leave Alaska.

Ryan
3 months ago
Reply to  floridawoman

Go back to Florida

8 months ago

The port should choose a name.
I put out the Kikkan Randall port.
Let’s show this girl some love.

Regular Alaskan
8 months ago

It’s all fun and political games until the PoA fails; then it is finger pointing and finger sniffing. Most Alaskans benfit from this port regardless of your political denomination. Asking ANC to shoulder the entire cost seems sort of dumb (but good for tax revenues). The State could privatize it or a portion of it. Or we could fix it as a state (with DoD help) and then be little Bronson for solving a problem. I guess the point is doing nothing but complaining isn’t a solution.